Showing posts with label Eclipse Set Central. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Eclipse Set Central. Show all posts

Monday, December 6, 2010

David Slade Explains Why 'Eclipse' Is The Best Twilight Film So Far

MTV's Hollywood Crush chatted with David Slade last week in anticipation of the 'Eclipse' DVD release and he explained to them why he thinks 'Eclipse' is the best film so far: 

"I think it had the best story," he said. "And the most action."

That's all well and good, David, but we think you had a little something to do with it, too.


"You know, I did my best," he said with a chuckle. "The director of the film is always the harshest critic of the film. What you do is spend two years or a-year-and-a-half or whatever it is intensely, emotionally working on something. You watch it a thousand times. What you're doing is assembling it together, and then there's a bunch of cracks, and you're closing the gaps in those cracks. And then, what happens in the end, you go, and you start noticing those cracks again. It's the same with any film."

Yes, David clearly is his own worst critic, but he did admit the film had a lot going for it.

"I certainly do believe we had one of the best stories," he said. "'Eclipse' is the fans' favorite book, behind 'Twilight,' the first book. There's so much in terms of backstory and understanding characters. It has a very clear progression to Bella's transformation; not physically but emotionally. That's something that is important. That, along with the fact that we had so many fun backstory moments. We had a Western. We had a 16th century historical piece. We had a '30s period piece, as well as the rest of it."

It did sort of feel like "Eclipse" had several movie-within-movie moments, didn't it? We can only hope "Breaking Dawn" lives up to its predecessor.

post signature

46 Pages of Eclipse Screencaps!!


  Doesn't he own a shirt?! (LOL)


 Go HERE for 46 (yes 46) pages of delicious Eclipse screencaps! 

post signature







via TwiCrackAddict

Eclipse Meadow Scene Pics: Swoon!









See more over @ Twilightish
post signature

David Slade Talks About Robert Pattinson & Calls Him An Enigma.


post signature
via ROBsessed

Friday, December 3, 2010

Ecliipse DVD Extra: Shirtless Jacob Carries Bella (ALL DAY)


post signature
Thanks Rachel @ NBC!

David Slade Explains Why He Cut the "Window Scene" in Eclipse


I have been waiting to hear why this scene would have possibly been cut from the movie....though I knew it probably had something to do with the length of the movie....but I mean COME ON it would have been what 30 seconds tops?! This is one of my FAVORITE scenes from the book so I was ticked when it wasn't in the movie. 

Anywho, MTV's Hollywood Crush explains:

Though he couldn't remember too many of the making-of segments, David was passionately involved with the DVD's deleted scenes special feature. He teases us with a preview of one such scene after the jump!

Fortunately for all you Bella and Edward fans, one of the film's cut scenes is a "sweet little moment" between the two. Apparently there was a running argument between the couple throughout the course of the film, but David ultimately decided to cut it from the film.

"We were trying to get the film to a manageable length, to flow really well, and it was like hitting a speed bump. You just felt it every time you hit these scenes," he explained.

The scene that made it to the DVD's special features is one that "closed the argument." Edward is sitting outside Bella's house and is being "kind of a jerk, making certain demands which Edward is like to do throughout all of these films," and Bella finally gets fed up with him. She storms off to her room, locking her window, effectively telling Edward that he is not welcome in her boudoir that evening. But after a moment's hesitation, she unlocks and opens the window. (Aw, we wouldn't be able to keep the window closed either, Bella!)

If there's one thing we can never get enough of, it's lovely little Bella and Edward moments, though we can do without them fighting. We're glad that David chose to add his own commentary to all these scenes to explain why he cut them. I'm sure I'm not the only person out there who might have been okay with sitting through a three-hour-long version of "Eclipse."

post signature
via ROBsessed

David Slade Answers "5 Burning Questions" About 'Eclipse'

 
Eclipse director, David Slade chatted with EW and answered "five burning questions" about Eclipse:
 
         1. Why doesn’t he do a commentary track?
Slade is obviously well-represented in the feature-length making-of documentary and introduces and provides context for deleted and extended scenes, but he’s not on either of the two commentary tracks over the movie — he leaves those to Stephenie Meyer and producer Wyck Godfrey, and Stewart and Robert Pattinson (she’s in Montreal, jealous that he’s in L.A. eating In-N-Out). “It’s a choice I made after doing my first ever and last ever commentary on my first film Hard Candy,” he says. “I did a commentary for that and found it such an unsatisfactory experience, personally, that I vowed never to do it again, because I’m not very good at it. You work for a year-and-a-half, two years, however long it is on a film, and it’s a very personal experience as well as a very public experience. There’s so much catharsis that goes into it, and then you end up sitting in a little room and you reduce what was an intense amount of work down to a crappy, silly little anecdote usually. ‘It was raining that day.’ [Laughs] I just found it to be really disheartening, and, like I say, I’m not really good at it. I didn’t do one for my second film [30 Days of Night] either.”

2. Listening to Stephenie and Wyck’s commentary, you hear a lot of the discussions that went on on-set, like debating how Jacob should kiss Bella both times, and you realize what a collaborative experience making a Twilight film must be. Is that helpful or more challenging as a director?
“If you’re in sync with everybody, the collaboration is second nature. What you’re doing is looking for the best ideas and utilizing them. Certainly there is a lot of collaboration, but there is also a lot of clarity that has to be had in the vision that you have for the film when you come in as the director. Without that, there’s no bullseye to be aiming for,” he says. “There’s all kinds of things that we can discuss, but at the end of the day, I’m the guy that has to go off and get the shot… Film is always a fight because you’re the person, as the director, with a clear picture in your head of what you think is really exciting, and you’re just trying to convince a bunch of other people to buy into that. That’s always gonna be a tough ride, particularly when there’s two very successful films that have gone beforehand. There’s a tendency to think safely. ‘We have something that works. Why would we change this or that?’ Anything that was changed, they took lots of discussion. But there was nothing that was likeeverybody disagrees. There were only discussions to get to a point where everybody was comfortable.” One example: The shattering vampires in Eclipse. “I was really fascinated with the pathology of the creatures. There’s one thing to write something from an emotional place when she imagined it, a dream of a man who’s made of diamonds, which is now the mythology and the lore that goes into how she describes Edward Cullen. But then to me, well, that’s esoteric. I have to make something really tangible. So let’s get pathological, let’s figure out why do they shine, and therefore what are they made of, and therefore why do they break?,” Slade says. “There was a certain balance that had to be struck between a really great visual image and also what would work for Stephenie. One of the things I remember was the size of the pieces. You couldn’t have biscuit-size pieces around because people might find them. Which is fair enough. We would have to then adapt our effects work to make sure there were no biscuit-size pieces. There were big chunks that broke off that could all be found and burned, because in the books, of course they continue to live. They’re not inanimate, those little pieces will crawl around, which we took cinematic license not to do.”

3. Why don’t we see all the deleted scenes described in the commentaries on the DVD?
Stewart describes the first thing she shot on the movie — a “fairly ridiculous” sequence in which she imagined herself in the fireside flashback as the Quileute elder chief’s third wife, who stabbed and sacrificed herself to distract the vengeful female vampire attacking the village. Meyer and Godfrey describe people laughing when they saw it. Understandable that they would choose not to include it. Ditto the scene Bella imagined after her kiss with Jacob on the mountain. She saw them having grown old together. “There were a lot of issues with prosthetic makeup,” Slade says with a groan, then a laugh. “It gives me a bit of a shiver, as a filmmaker. As an idea, it was wonderful. What happens with a film is it becomes organic and it grows, and it tells you what it wants, and it was screaming loudly, ‘I don’t want that!’ to me.” Another scene described in the commentaries never actually got shot. “Stephenie really wanted to see Edward as a young man again, and we had this vision scripted for a while where Bella and he are together in Victorian times, as a kind of reverie,” Slade says.

4. Did he ever toss a grape into Taylor Lautner’s mouth between takes?
The making-of documentary occasionally breaks into “Taylor Time” (there’s even a graphic) during which we see Lautner having fun on-set. Slade’s assistant and Stewart are seen throwing grapes that Lautner catches in his mouth from a good distance away. Did the director ever partake in that game? “Not me,” he says. “I watched in astonishment and photographed him backflipping from a standstill, which he does. I also got to witness how he terrorized, in a very good-natured way, the bodyguards that were hired to make sure that they were all fine. He would play practical jokes on them all the time. It was quite a lot of fun.”

5. Why don’t we get a blooper reel on the DVD?
Kristen and Rob talk about how people fell a lot on the fake snow. That, for instance, we would have liked to have seen. “We had a blooper reel, but I think people were pretty potty-mouthed,” Slade says. “I think you can put that down to bad language.”

post signature
Source Via

Eclipse DVD Commentary: Rob & Kristen Talk About Motorcycle Scene!



"He wants to hold my hand...." LMAO I LOVE the commentary! LOVE IT!

post signature
Via

Wednesday, December 1, 2010

For the ROBsessed: An 'Eclipse' DVD Buying Guide


I am super lazy... so I am glad ROBsessed is on top of things! :)  They have put together a GREAT 'Eclipse' DVD buying guide.  It lets you know what version is for sale where and what it includes!

Go check it out HERE!

post signature

We Amost Had An 'Eclipse' Wedding!


According to Next Movie, Eclipse director David Slade thought about shooting the 'Breaking Dawn' wedding for 'Eclipse', the third installment of the saga:

“We discussed a lot of the things at the script-writing stage — at one point, we were even going to shoot the wedding at the end of ["Eclipse"] but we knew there was another film coming,” Slade tells NextMovie exclusively.“We knew that a lot of that could go into the next film. And we just made the most concise version of this story that we could.”

I am glad they saved it for Breaking Dawn! Can't wait to see that part of the movie! It had better be EPIC!

post signature







Monday, November 22, 2010

Extended 'Eclipse' Scenes: Why Weren't These in The Movie?!





I have to TOTALLY agree with ROBsessed on this one....These scenes TOTALLY should have been in the movie...as a matter of fact, sitting in the theatre I was totes pissed when the "keep your window closed" scene was not included. And I ranted the whole way home about too much newborn crap and not enough Edward & Bella.

post signature